Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

2 Dept. of Biosystem Engineering

Abstract

Plastic debris remaining in the field after harvest is one of the difficulties in farming under plastic mulch. In this study, the performance parameters of a domestic plastic remover machine in collecting plastic mulches were evaluated. The dependent factors were fuel consumption, plastic tearing frequency during collecting and the total collecting time. The independent factors included film thickness (two levels: 20 and 30 μm), ground speed (three levels: 2.7, 3.8 and 5.4 km/h) and the time interval between harvesting and plastic collecting (two levels: 5 and 10 days). The tests were performed in triplicate in a full factorial experimental design. Experiments were carried out in some farms of Fars province employing a two-wheel drive MF399 tractor. The results showed that using thick plastic (30 μm) reduces the plastic tearing frequency and hence with a lower number of stops, reduces the fuel consumption and increases the efficiency of the machine during plastic collection. To increase the efficiency of plastic collection, when using 30 μm plastic, the ground speed of 5.4 km/h is recommended. The best plastic collecting time with the minimum tearing frequency of are recommended as 5 and 10 days after harvesting for 20 and 30 μm plastics, respectively. According to the results the least fuel consumption was observed for collection of 30 μm plastic and with ground speed of 5.4 km/h. Also the simultaneous collection of drip irrigation tapes and plastic mulch tapes reduce costs and increase the efficiency of the plastic mulch remover.

Keywords

Abdolkarimzadeh, M. 2007. Plasticulture. Morsal Press. Iran. (in Persian)
 
Ashrafuzzaman, A., Abdul-Halim, M., Razi-Ismail, M., Rashidullah, S. M. and Almagir-Hossain, M. 2011. Effect of plastic mulch on growth and yield of chilli. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 54(2): 321-330.
 
Baghani, J., Dehghani, H. and Sadr-Ghayeni, S. H. 2010. Study the effects of plastic mulches and different irrigation water levels on qualitative and quantitative yield of melon in surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems. Iranian J. Irrig. Drain. 4(2): 175-181. (in Persian)
 
Dehghan-Khanyeki, M. and Abbaspour-Fard, M. H. 2012. Optimization, evaluation and introduction of a single combined planting vegetables. The 7th Congress of Agricultural Machinery. Sep. 6-7. Shiraz, Iran. (in Persian)
 
Heidari, N. and Ahmadi, M. 2000. Using plastic mulch in vegetable farming for irrigation water saving. Jihad-Keshavarzi Quarterly. 11, 20-32. (in Persian)
 
Ibarra, L., Flores, J. and CarlosDoaaz-Pearez, J. 2001. Growth and yield of muskmelon in response to plastic mulch and row covers. Sci. Hortic-Amsterdam. 87, 139-145.
 
McCraw, D. and Motes, J. 2002. Use of plastic mulch and row covers in vegetable production. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, HLA-6034.
 
Moreno, M. and Moreno, A. 2008. Effect of different biodegradable and polyethylene mulches on soil properties and production in a tomato crop. Sci. Hortic-Amsterdam.116, 256-263.
 
Parish, R. L and Bracy, R. P. 1999. An Automated machine for removal plastic mulch. T-ASAE.
42(1): 49-51.
 
Zotarelli, L., Dukes, M., Scholberg, J., Hanselman, T., Femminella, K. and Munoz-Carpena, R. 2008. Nitrogen and water use efficiency of zucchini squash for a plastic mulch bed system on a sandy soil. Sci. Hortic-Amsterdam. 116, 8-16
 
Kepner R. A., Bainer, R. and Barger E. L. 1978. Principles of Farm Machinery. Third Edition. AVI Pub. U.S.A.