Document Type : Original Article

Author

Abstract

The effects of soil moisture content, forward speed and operation depth during harvesting by a potato digger (without conveyor shaker) on tubers quantitative and qualitative damages were studied and the optimum conditions were determined for treatments. The experiments were arranged as a strip split plot test based on complete block design with three factors and three replications. Mechanical damage rates of potatoes due to mechanized and traditional (manual) harvesting methods were compared by t-test. Buried tubers rate (quantitative loss) was increased with increasing of forward speed especially in wet soil probably due to the excessive soil transferred to the conveyor. Peeled tubers rate was reduced by increasing forward speed to 3 km/h in soils with low moisture content. The optimum conditions for mechanized potato harvesting with minimal quantitative loss and damage rate to product quality obtained at soil moisture of 10-15% db (40-60% Field Capacity) and 2-3 km/h forward speed. The cutting damage of tubers in traditional harvesting method was more than mechanized one, while the peeling damage rate was less. Generally, external damage rate of tubers in traditional method was significantly more than that obtained from mechanized method.

Keywords

Baritelle A.L., Hyde, G.M., Thornton, R. and Bajema, R. 2000. A classification system for impact-related defects in potato tubers, American J. Potato Res.77(3): 143-148.
 
Bentini, M., Caprara, C. and Martelli, R. 2006. Harvesting damage to potato tubers by analysis of impacts recorded with an instrumented sphere. Biosystems Engineering. 94(1): 75-85.
 
Bishop, C. F. H. and Maunder, W. 1980. Potato Mechanization and Storage. First publication. Farming press LTD. 97-130.
 
Hemmat, A. and Taki, O. 2001. Potato losses and mechanical damage by potato diggers in Fereidan’s region of Isfahan. J. Sci.Technol. Agric. Natur. Resour. 5(2): 195-209. (in Persian)
 
Khater, I. M. M. 2009. Effect of working speeds of mechanical harvesting on potato damage in south eastern Qantara. 4th Conference on Recent Technology in Agriculture. 3-5 Nov. Cario, Giza, Egypt.
 
Kong, W. S. and Halderson, J. L. 1991. A vibratory two-row potato digger. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 7(6): 683-687.
 
McRae, D.C. 1980. Mechanical damage to potatoes by harvesting and handling. Ann. Appl. Biol. 96, 360-363.
 
Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. 2015. Crop production yearbook (2013-2014). Department of Planning and Economy. (in Persian)
 
Mousazadeh, H., Mobli, H. and Zaefizadeh, M. 2006. A determination of potato tuber mechanical damage due to impacts of three harvesting machines, and their comparison, Ardebil area. Iranian J. Agric Sci. 37(5): 911-918. (in Persian)
 
Peters, R. 1996. Damage of potato tubers, a review. Potato Research. 39, 479-484.
 
Peterson, C.L., Thornton, R.E. and Smittle, D.A. 1975. Potato harvester evaluations. Transactions of the ASAE. 18(2): 240-245.
 
Rezaee, A. and Soltani, A. 1996. Introduction to Potato Production. Jahad-e Daneshgahi Mashhad Publications. 145. (in Persian)
 
Srivastava, A. K., Goreing, C. R. and Rohrbach, R. P. 1993. Engineering Principles of Agricultural Machines. Published by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
 
Thornton, R.E., Hyde, G.W., Thornton, R.K. and Hammond, M.W. 1985. Chain speed adjustment to obtain low tuber damage at harvest. ASAEPaper No. 85: 1141.
 
Valueva, T. I. 1975. Effect of weather and soil conditions and degree of ripeness of potato tubers on resistance to mechanical damage. Nauchnye Trudy, Institute Kartofel'nogo. Khozyaistva. 24, 124-130.