Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research Education And Extention Organization, Shiraz, Iran

10.22092/amsr.2025.370589.1524

Abstract

In seed purity testing, machine vision can be used as a suitable alternative to human vision. In this research, a machine vision system was used, which included three parts: suction box, sampling box, and imaging box. The above machine vision system was evaluated for seeds of corn and pinto bean. For each type of seed, the performance of the suction device, with three seed plates (with hole diameters of 1, 1.5 and 2 mm) and four suction values (-80, -100, -120 and -130 mmHg) was evaluated. A factorial experiment in the form of a completely randomized design with two factors and five replications was used for statistical analysis of the data and Duncan's test was used to compare the means. In each amount of suction, the total number of seeds of sticked to the seed plate, the number of singled seeds and the number of seeds of sticked together on each hole were counted and their percentage was calculated. After that, for the two types of seeds tested, the algorithm for determining the percentage of breakage and the number of seed coding and validation of the algorithm was evaluated in 30 repetitions. The results showed that for corn seed, treatment 10 (seed plate with holes 2 mm and suction value -100 mm Hg) and for pinto bean seed, treatment 11 (seed plate with 2 mm holes and suction value -120 mm Hg) were the most suitable treatments. The validation results of the algorithm for determining the percentage of breakage and the number of seeds for corn seeds showed that the average accuracy of the algorithm was equal to 100%. For seed of pinto beans, the algorithm validation results showed that the average accuracy of the algorithm in determining the percentage of breakage and the number of seeds were 95.27 and 99.47%, respectively. It is suggested that this system be used to measure and evaluate the physical properties of seeds of different sizes.  

Keywords

Corder, G. W., Foreman, D. I., & Wiley InterScience (Online service). (2009). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians a step-by-step approach. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118165881.
Farouk, S. M., & Islam, M. N. (1995). Effect of parboiling and milling parameters on breakage of rice grains. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 26(4), 33-38.
Ghaderifar, F., & Soltani, A. (2010). Seed control and certification. Publications of Mashhad University- Jahad. (in Persian)
Gunasekaran, S., Paulsen, M. R., & Shove, G. C. (1985). Optical methods for nondestructive quality evaluation of agricultural and biological materials. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 32(2), 209-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(85)90081-2.
Gunasekaran, S., Paulsen, M. R., & Shove, G. C. (1986). A laser optical method for detecting corn kernel defects. Transactions of the ASAE, 29(l), 294-298, 304. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30142.
Gunasekaran, S., Cooper, T. M., Berlage, A. G., & Krishnan, P. (1987). Image processing for stress cracks in corn kernels. Transactions of the ASAE, 30(1), 266-271. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30438.
Kapadia, V. N., Sasidharan, N., & Kalyanrao, P. (2017). Seed Image Analysis and Its Application in Seed Science Research. Advances in Biotechnology and Microbiology, 7(2), https://doi.org/10.19080/AIBM.2017.07.555709.
Majumdar, S., & Jayas, D. S. (2000). Classification of cereal grains using machine vision: III. Texture models. Transactions of the ASABE, 43(6), 1681-1687. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.3068.
Matshuisa, T., & Hosokawa, A. (1981). Possibilities of checking cracks in brown rice using illumination by oblique ray and image data processing system. Journal of the Society of Agriculture machinery of Japan, 42(4), 515-520. https://doi.org/10.11357/jsam1937.42.515.
Shaker, M., Minaei, S., Khushtaqaza, M. H., Banakar, A., & Jafari, A. (2015). Using machine vision to improve performance and reduce waste in paddy peeling machine. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Engineering Research Journal, 16(65), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.22092/erams.2016.105953. (in Persian)
Shaker, M., Yazdani, S., Mohammadi, D., & Alevi Manesh, S. M. (2022). Determining the percentage of breakage and impurity of wheat seed based on the image processing method with the construction and evaluation of a single device (Research Report), Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, No: 62686. (in Persian)
Shaker, M., & Jokar, A. (2023). Evaluation of the Machine Vision System to Determine the Percentage of Breakage and the Number of Sorghum, Cotton and Barley Seeds. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research Journal, 24(86), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.22092/amsr.2024.365359.1484.
(in Persian)
Tanska, M., Rotkiewicz, D., Kozirok, W., & Konopka, I. (2005). Measurement of the geometrical features and surface colour of rapeseeds using digital image analysis. Food Research International, 38(7), 741-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.01.008.
Venora, G., Grillo, O., Ravalli, C., & Cremonini, R. (2009). Identification of Italian landraces of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using an image analysis system. Scientia Horticulturae, 121(4), 410-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.03.014.
Yan, X., Wang, J., Liu, S., & Zhang, C. (2017). Purity identification of maize seed based on color characteristics. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture (CCTA). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18354-6_73.
Zayas, I., Converse, H., & Steele, J. (1990). Discrimination of whole from broken corn kernels with image analysis. Transactions of the ASAE, 33(5), 1642-1646. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31521.