Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Agriculture Engineering Research Institute, Iran

2 Association Professor, AERI, Iran

3 scientific board member

4 Agricultural engineering department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and natural resources research and education center, AREEO, Mashhad, Itan

Abstract

Tomato moth is one of the most destructive pests in tomato farms. One of the methods to control this pest is the chemical spraying using different sprayers. In recent years, spraying drones have also been used for chemical control of pests, but the performance of these sprayers in tomato farms has not been evaluated yet. In this research, three different spraying methods were evaluated in controling the Tota pest in a tomato farm in Safadasht Karaj region in a completely randomized design (RCD) and in three replications. Experimental treatments included:  1- spraying with the tractor lancer sprayer, 2- spraying with a back knapsack sprayer (atomizer), and 3- spraying with Sprayer drone. The results obtained with Duncan's multi-range test at the level of significant of 1% showed that the consumption of solution of pesticide was 373.3, 207.1 and 8.4 liters per hectare, the rate of drift was 46.5%, 32.6% and 9.9%, the effective capacity of farm was 0.5, 0.4 and 4.9 hectares per hour, and the farm efficiency was 44.6%, 35.7% and 68.0% in tractor lancer sprayer, knapsck sprayer and sprayer drone, respectively. In terms of effectiveness, based on the number of tunnels made by larvae on fruits and the number of live larvae found after 3, 7 and 10 days of spraying, it has been found that the tractor lancer sprayer had the highest effectiveness with 82% in 10 days after spraying. The spraying quality coefficient in knapsack sprayer and drone sprayer was 2.92 and 1.22, respectively. From the economical point of view, the benefit - cost ratio was 1.93, 1.88 and 4.80, in tractor lancer sprayer, knapsck sprayer and sprayer drone respectively. which shows that the sprayer drone works better than the other two sprayers. Based on technical and economical results, our recommendation is to use sprayer drone to control the Tota pest, despite its lower effectiveness.

Keywords

Anon. (2009). First record of tutaabsoluta in Italy. Reporting Services 2(023). European Plant Protection Organization (EPPO). Available at: http://www.eppo.org.
Chen, P., Lan, Y., Huang, X., Qi, H., Wang, G., Wang, J., Wang, L., & Xiao, H. (2020). Droplet deposition and control of planthoppers of different nozzles in two-stage rice with a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle. Agronomy, 10 (303), 1-14.
Giles, D. K., & Billing, R. C. (2015). Deployment and performance of a UAV for crop spraying. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 44, 307-312.
Henderson, C. F., & Tilton, E. W. (1955). Test with Acaricides against the Brown Wheat Mite. Journal of Economic Entomology, 48, 157-161.
Huang, Y., Hoffmann, W. C., Lan, Y., Wu, W., & Fritz, B. K. (2009). Development of a spray system for an unmanned aerial vehicle platform. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 25(6), 803-809.
Kharim, M. N. A., Wayayok, A., Shariff, A. R. M., Abdullah, A. F., & Husin, E. M. (2019). Droplet deposition density of organic liquid fertilizer at low altitude UAV aerial spraying in rice cultivation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 167(17),105045.
Miller, J. W. (2005). Report on the development and operation of a UAV for an experiment on the unmanned application of   pesticides. Youngstown, Ohio: AFRL, USAF.
Safari, M., & Bagheri, N. (2021). Technical criteria for the evaluation of sprayer drones. Technical Instruction. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. (in Persian)
Safari, M., & Sheikhigarjan, A. (2019). Investigating different methods of spraying trees to fight the palm weevil. Research Report. Extention magazine, Agricultural Education and Extension Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extention Organization. (in Persian)
Salloum, W. M. (2019). Effect of sprayer, nozzle types and spraying volume on efficacy of chemical compounds against tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) infesting tomato. Egyptian Journal of Plant Protection Research Institute, 2(2), 247-255.
Seidin, P. (2018). Guidelines for the Use of spraying drones to control pests. Plant Protection Organization, Pest Control Deputy, Pesticide Office. (in Persian)
Soltani, G. (2008). Engineering economics. Shiraz University Press, Second Ed. (in Persian)
Torres, J. B., Faria, C. A., Evangelista, W. S., & Pratissoli, D. (2001). Within-plant distribution of leaf miner Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) immatures in processing tomatoes, with notes on plant phenology. International Journal of Pest Management, 47(3),173-178.
Wang, S., Song, J., He, X., Song, Le., Wang, X., Wang, C., Wang, Z., & Ling, Y. (2017). Performances evaluation of four typical unmanned aerial vehicles used for pesticide application in China. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 10(4), 22-31.
Yallappa, D. (2017). Development and evaluation of drone mounted sprayer for pesticide applications to crops. Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), Oct. 19-22. San Jose, CA, USA.
Zarifneshat, S., Saeedirad, M. H., Safari, M., Moatamedoshariati, H. R., & Naseri, M. (2022). Evaluation of the sprayer drone in the fight against wheat weeds and its comparison with conventional methods. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research. 23(82), 53-70. (in Persian)
Zhou, Q., Xue, X., Qin, W., Chen, Ch., & Cai, Ch. (2020). Analysis of pesticide use efficiency of a UAV sprayer at different growth stages of rice. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 3(1), 38-42.
Zhua, H., Salyanib, M., & Fox, R. (2011). A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 76, 38-43.