Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Researcher of mechanizationAcademic member, Department of Agricultural Engineering Research, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ardabil, Iran

2 Academic member, Department of Agricultural Engineering Research, AREEO, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Peanuts are harvested in two stages. The first stage involves the complete removal of the plants from the soil and the second stage is the drying and separation of the peanut pod from the plant. This study was conducted in Moghan, in 2020. The purposes of this study were to estimate cost and benefit of harvesting methods and to determine profitability indices with using a special peanut traction combine. The experiment was performed based on a split plot design in the form of randomized complete blocks with four replications. The research was based on whether the imported traction combine is more economical compared to other common methods of peanut harvesting? Three harvest methods in the second stage include: b1- combine harvesting b2 - harvesting with a thresher behind the tractor, b3 - manual harvesting. To find out if the assumption proved, we used partial budgeting technique including net present value (NPV), economic and non-economic test for substitution of harvesters and marginal rate of return (MRR). The results showed that the MRR rate of replacing the application of traction combine with other treatments in the average area harvest conditions is higher than 41.83%. According to the results, it was found that net profit in traction combine harvesting compared to thresher behind the tractor and manual method had a profitability of 6.07 and 8.82 percent, and a cost reduction of 4.86 and 23.43 percent, respectively.

Keywords

 
Asadi, H., & Mostofi-Sarkari, M. R. )2018(. Economical Assessment of Different Wheat Harvesters in Tehran Province. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research, 19(71), 55-64. (in Persian)
 
Azmoudeh Mishamandani, A., Navid, H., Abdollahpour, Sh., & Moghaddam Vahed, M. )2014). Comparison of peanut harvest losses in both machine and manual methods. Proceedings of the 8th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery Engineering (Biosystems) and Mechanization of Iran. Jan. 1. Mashhad, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian)
 
Dillon, J. L., & Hardaker, J. B. (1993). Farm management research for small farmer development. 2nd Ed. FAO, Rome, Italy. Agricultural Services Devision.
 
Emadi, B., Nikkhah, A., Khojastehpour, M., & Peyman, S. H.) 2014(. The effect of farm size on energy consumption and input costs of peanut production in Guilan province. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 5(1), 217-227. (in Persian)
 
Heidarzadeh, E., Almasi, M., Dehghanian, S., & Shahnooshi, N. (2007). Camparison of agricultural machineries productivity and labor in three systems of mechanization, mid-mechanization and mid-traditional in wheat production in Mashad city. Proceedings of the 6th Iranian Conference of Agricultural Economic. Oct. 30. University of Ferdousi, Mashad, Iran. (in Persian)
 
Majnoun Hosseini, N. (2009). Grain legume production. Jahad University of Mashhad. (in Persian)
 
Panhwar, F. (2005). Oilseed crops future in Sindh Pakistan. Digitalvelarg Gmbh, Germany.
 
Reddy, T. Y., Reddy, V. R., & Anbumozhi, V. (2003). Physiological response of groundnut to drought stress and its amelioration: A critical review. Plant Growth Regulation, 41, 75-88.
 
Reshad Sedghi, A., & Zabolestani, M. (2003). Comparison of two methods mechanized and conventional of direct rice cultivation in terms of product performance and production costs (Research Report). East Azarbaijan Research Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources Pub. (in Persian)
 
Soltani, G. R., & Najafi, B. (1983). Agricultural economic. Published University Center. University of Shiraz. (in Persian)
 
Taghinezhad, J. (2019). Mechanization of peanuts in Moghan plain. Technical Journal. Publishing Committee in Research Institute of Agricultural Engineering. Registration number 56307. (in Persian)