Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

In this research suitability of dimension and size, location of some control equipment’s and driver surroundings with dimension, sizes and abilities of tractor drivers in Fars province was evaluated. Anthropometric data was essential requirement for adjustment of machine equipments with potentiality and competence of human. In this project the first necessary anthropometric data, for about 250 tractor drivers that were in age range of 20–60 year was measured randomly. The next some of prevalent tractors specifications in Fars province with anthropometric data of fifth and ninety and fifth percentiles of drivers was compared and evaluated. The results showed that stair space of evaluated tractors from the ground was more than optimum range. Chair depth of New Holland and Valtra tractors for fifth percentile drivers was great and for elimination of this difficulty proper seat back with adjustable thickness was recommended. The  surveys showed that chair depth of model 285 and 399 of massey furgousen tractors was shorter than thigh length of ninety and fifth percentile drivers, which caused the driver’s discomfort. In massey furgousen tractor model 285 and Valtra tractors distance of steering wheel from seat reference point was more than hand length of fifth percentile drivers. Therefore the length of drivers hand was considered to be short for proper grip on  steering wheel. The  surveys showed that the drivers of massey furgousen tractors (Model 399) faced difficulty in for accessing  the gear lever.

Keywords

Guenaelle, P. 1995. One methodology to evaluate automotive seat comfort. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Vehicle Comfort and Ergonomics. March 29-31. Bologna. Italy.
 
Gupta, P. K., Gupta, M. L. and Sharm, A. P. 1983. Anthropometric survey of Indian farm workers.
AMA-Agr. Mech. Af. 14(1): 27-30.
 
Gyi, D. E., Porter, J. M. and Robertson, K. B. 1998. Seat pressure measurement technologies: considerations for their evaluation. Appl. Ergon. 27(2): 85-91.
 
Mganilwa, Z. M., Mpanduji, S. M., Makungu, P. J. and Dihenga, H. O. 2003. Promoting local production of small multipurpose tractors in Tanzania. International Conference on Industrial Design Engineering. July 17-18. UDSM, DAR ES SALAAM,
 
Miyamoto, M., Shirai, Y., Nakayama, Y., Gembung, Y. and Kaneda, K. 2000. An epidemiologic study of occupational low back pain in truck drivers. J. Nippon Med. Sch. 67(3): 186-190.
 
Porter, J. M. and Gyi, D. E. 1998. Interface pressure and the prediction of car seat discomfort. Int. J. Vehicle Des. 19(3): 255-266.
 
Rasmussen, J., Trholm, S. and Zee, M. D. 2009. Computational analysis of the influence of seat pan inclination and friction on muscle activity and spinal joint forces. Int. J. Ind. Ergonom. 39, 52-57.
 
Rostami, M. A., Javadi, A., Heidari-Soltanabadi, M., Mehdinia, A. and Shaker, M. 2015. Ergonomic assessment of some commonly used tractors in Iran. J. Agric. Mech. 5(2): 456-467. (in Persian)
 
Sanders, S. M. and McCormic, E. J. 1987. Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-hill Book Company.
 
Smith, D. W., Sims, B. G. and Neil, D. H. O. 1994. Testing and evaluation of agricultural machinery and equipment. Principle and practices. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin. No. 110.
 
Studman, C. 1998. Ergonomic in apple sorting: a pilot study. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 70, 323-334.
 
Tse, J. L. M. 2006. Bus driver well-being review: 50 years of research. Transpor. Res. F. 9, 89-114.
 
Whyte, R. T. and Stayner, R. M. 1985. Design criteria for tractor seats. Proceedings of the 8th Joint CIGR/AAMRH/IUFRO Ergonomics Conference. Silsoe, Bedfordshire.
 
Woodson, W. E. and Berry, T. P. 1992. Human Factors Design Handbook. McGraw – Hill Book Company.
 
Yadav, R. and Tewari, V. K. 1998. Tractor operator Workplace design-a review. J. Terramechanics.
35(1): 41-53.
 
Yisa, M. G. 2002. Ergonomic of tractor assembled in Nigeria. Biosys. Eng. 81(2): 169-177.